What we do in life echoes in eternity

“My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust? If the whole show was bad and senseless from A to Z, so to speak, why did I, who was supposed to be part of the show, find myself in such violent reaction against it? A man feels wet when he falls into water, because man is not a water animal: fish would not feel wet. Of course I could have given up my idea of justice by saying it was nothing but a private idea of my own. But if I did that, then my argument against God collapsed too-for the argument depended on saying that the world was really unjust, not simply that it did not happen to please my fancies. Thus in the very act of trying to prove that God did not exist-in other words, that the whole of reality was senseless-I found I was forced to assume that one part of reality-namely my idea of justice-was full of sense. Consequently atheism turns out to be too simple. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never know it was dark. Dark would be a word without meaning.”
-C. S. Lewis - Mere Christianity


i majored in philosophy and Religious studies.  As a result a lot of the classes that i took dealt with the issues of God, and the attempt to fully prove or disprove his existence, his being.  This came in the form of philosopher's we studies, christian, not christian, agnostic, atheistic and everything else, and people in classes who fell in the same spectrum. i often found myself to be one of the few Christians, or at least one of the few who wasn't afraid to go toe to toe with those who didn't believe he existed.  No matter what the discussion was focused on the idea of the problem of evil always came up and was presented as the trump card.

The problem of evil goes like this in its simplest form
Premis:
1. If God exists he is omniscient, omnipresent, and omni-benevolent
2. Because God is omni-benevolent everything he creates must be good, there can be no evil
3. There is evil in the world
Conclusion
4. Therefore God does not exist.

From a strictly logical philosophical point of view the argument is sound, the conclusion follows from the premises and there are no logical fallacies.  However, there is an understanding fallacy with in the premises.  That fallacy being that we are able to understand God.  It is illogical to think this way.

To think that we can stand on par mentally with the creator of the universe, the being with out beginning is the ultimate display of hubris and lunacy.  Our brightest minds cannot grasp the full capacity of the human mind, or physics, or how our own biological process works, or calculus. All these things that God created we cannot and do not understand completely.  Yet we think we can fully understand the creator?  It is laughable and incredibly narcissistic.  The ancient roman philosopher Cicero said once "Either God wishes to remove evils and cannot,or he can do so and is unwilling." The famous atheist Sam Harris comments on this quote by Cicero saying "Therefore God is either impotent or evil."


i would say that the only thing Cicero proves and Harris as well is what the Word of God says "For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are my ways your ways, declares the Lord" - Isaiah 55:8.  Both of these men believed that they understood God and his nature, they couldn't have been farther from the truth.


The existence of evil in the world no more disproves the existence of God than the existence of the sun disproves the existence of darkness.  The suffering, the evil, the injustice and all the things people say negate God's existence are actually saying it negates their ability to reason God and his nature based on our nature.  i don't understand nuclear physics one bit, doesn't make any sense, don't really know how it works.  But just because i don't understand it, and there are parts that seem unexplainable doesn't disprove it as a real thing, just simply beyond the complexities of my mind. 


Atheist or agnostics either don't want to or don't know how to put faith in something as big as God.  They are too scared, or proud, or self absorbed, or all of the above or any other reason you can come up with.  They may claim that they don't believe in faith they believe in science, but that would just make them a global skeptic on a metaphysical and epistemological level.  They would have to say that nothing exists and we can have no knowledge.  In fact they would have to be skeptics of skepticism.  The fact is Atheist, et. al. do have faith, they put faith in a lot, they just chose not to put faith in God.  They make science their god, they make the golden cafe their god.  The saddest part is, we[christians] live our lives in a way that allows them to do this.  We make these same things our god, we follow in the exact same footsteps of the Israelites, who we scoff at and say how could they reject God like that? We put our faith in the creation not the creator.


The problem is not with evil, it never has been, which is why God doesn't get rid of it, because we don't understand what God is doing.  Suffering has a purpose, is it fun no, but not everything in life is fun and pleasurable.  Hedonism can not be the driving force in the world, because hedonism is a lie.  It is fueled by lust. The problem is with humans, with their mindset, with the decisions we make from the free will that we have been granted through God's divine providence and knowledge.  If you accept the fact that we cannot understand everything about God's nature, all of the arguments against God become lunacy and hubris.


Harris in a recent publication used the analogy of Hurricane Katrina to illustrate his point. "Only the atheist," he writes, "has the courage to admit the obvious: these poor people [who prayed to God in New Orleans then died] spent their lives in the company of an imaginary friend." Harris is wrong, he lacks understanding.  In reality only the atheist, has the hubris to make the claim: that as the creation they had the same amount of knowledge to call themselves the great "I am" to count themselves equal with the creator.  

“One philosopher formulated an argument against God this way: First, there is no reason that would justify God in permitting so much evil rather than a lot less; second, if God exists, then there must be such a reason; so, three, God does not exist….
That’s like saying it’s reasonable to believe in God if six Jews die in a Holocaust, but not seven. Or sixty thousand but not sixty thousand and one, or 5,999,999, but not six million. When you translate the general statement ‘so much’ into particular examples like that, it shows how absurd it is. There can’t be a dividing line…. At what point does suffering disprove the existence of God? No such point can be shown. Besides, because we’re not God, we can’t say how much suffering is needed. Maybe every single element of pain in the universe is necessary.”
- Lee Strobel "The Case for Faith"